[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090209091849.GF31890@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:18:49 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Paul Collins <paul@...ly.ondioline.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud
(timekeeping_suspended)
* Paul Collins <paul@...ly.ondioline.org> wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12667
> > Subject : Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
> > Submitter : Paul Collins <paul@...ly.ondioline.org>
> > Date : 2009-01-21 7:15 (19 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123252215315106&w=4
>
> I've just done ten suspend/resume cycles with 2.6.29-rc4 and this
> message was not logged, so it's either gone away or else become much
> more difficult to reproduce.
Various suspend handlers were enabling irqs spuriously - fixed by recent patches in
-rc4. The warning above is consistent with the timekeeping code being surprised with
a premature irqs-enable.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists