[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090209101730.GM7975@enneenne.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:17:30 +0100
From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
To: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
Cc: udovdh@...all.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LinuxPPS@...enneenne.com
Subject: Re: [LinuxPPS] LinuxPPS kernel interface
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 01:09:38AM -0500, George Spelvin wrote:
> Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@...all.nl> wrote:
> > Interesting ideas, thanks for the input.
> >
> > I think I must mention that we also must strive for kernel inclusion.
> > Kernel inclusion will broaden our exposure.
> > This means we have to get rid of the issues blocking inclusion.
> > (see a query like http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&w=2&r=1&s=pps&q=b for
> > related posts)
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I agree, that's the goal. But it's also important to get the
> interface right, preferably before publishing it to world+dog.
>
> And then there are little things like the fact that an important header
> file like timepps.h probably shouldn't live in Documentation/pps...
>
> For example, here's a patch, on top of the previous series, that
> gets rid of the timeout argument to PPS_FETCH:
Please, note that such file is _not_ into kernel proposed patch.
First we should get inclusion of core code, then we can discuss about
userland interface and other related stuff.
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@...eenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@...ux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists