[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4990350C.4010908@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:52:12 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: hpa@...or.com, jeremy@...p.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86: math_emu info cleanup
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>> * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Impact: cleanup
>>>
>>> * Come on, struct info? s/struct info/struct math_emu_info/
>>>
>>> * Use struct pt_regs and kernel_vm86_regs instead of defining its own
>>> register frame structure.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/math_emu.h | 29 +++++------------
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
>>> arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_entry.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_proto.h | 2 +-
>>> arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h | 14 ++++----
>>> arch/x86/math-emu/get_address.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>> 6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>> Nice - that's a fix for .29 too, right?
>
> this one i mean:
>
> Subject: [PATCH 03/11] x86: fix math_emu register frame access
Yeap, 0001-0003 are candidates for .29 inclusion.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists