[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902091000400.14528@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:02:28 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand@...sony.com>,
Remis Lima Baima <remis.developer@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace, powerpc64: fix math to calculate offset in TOC
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting
> > up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple math error. To calculate
> > the offset in the TOC, I had used an OR, but the bottom half was
> > a signed extended short, and it should have been an addition.
> > The fix is in my tree below, as well as posted here.
>
> Looks like a .29 candidate?
Ingo,
I think Ben pulled them into their tree. The changes are specific to ppc,
and will probably get better user testing there. Unless you feel that we
have a bit of ppc testers using tip.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists