[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090209072531.5cf92d3a@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:25:31 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jkosina@...e.cz,
mchehab@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: create a request_module_nowait()
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:02:17 +1030
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Monday 09 February 2009 05:12:01 Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > This patch changes this to use a request_module_nowait() function
> > macro instead, which just fires the modprobe off but doesn't wait
> > for it, and thus avoids the original deadlock entirely.
>
> Nice, applied. Made one change; I've taken to using the new-fangled
> bool type for flag args, for slight extra clarity.
>
> (Which uncovered another interesting issue, which lead to several more
> patches).
>
for this case that's a bit unfortunate though.
the call usermode helper code takes 3 values, -1, 0 and 1.
Right now the code only uses 0 and 1, but I've been looking at
using -1 as well in this exact codepath in case there is a problem with
the 0 option (the 0 option waits for the exec but not the result, the
-1 waits for nothing)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists