linux-kernel - Re: Build failure with latest -git: btrfs on ppc64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:57:02 -0500
From:	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc:	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Build failure with latest -git: btrfs on ppc64

On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:57:26AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> Ok, I thought this would be defined to something simple for the
> non-ticket users, should I just not be using this call?  
> 

I think the use is fine, since it's really a judgement call based on
whether there's waiters for the ticket. I need to take a closer look
at where this is used to say...

It's inevitable for you to hit things like this though, as far as I know
you're the first user of this lock interface. :)

regards, Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/