[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090208.174854.51245719.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:48:54 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alex.williamson@...com
Cc: maxk@...lcomm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: Fix unicast filter overflow
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:43:57 -0700
> Sure, that's another option, but we'd then need to figure out what to do
> with TUN_FLT_ALLMULTI. Unicast would almost needs it's own hash list if
> we want to support an allmulti mode that's less than promiscuous. The
> return value of the ioctl is the number of exact filters, so the user
> will know what happened.
Oh so that's what the return value means.
Ok, I guess for now your patch is fine, I'll apply it and
queue it up for -stable, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists