[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49905E70.8000209@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:48:48 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-sff: fix 32-bit PIO regression
Hello, I wrote:
>>>> Yes, looks nice, and works for me. My only criticism would be,
>>>> minor issue unchanged by your patch, that actually "slop" isn't
>>>> unlikely enough to deserve an "unlikely" - slop of 1 or 3 is
>>>> unlikely, but slop of 2 is quite common.
>>> Common on what types of ATAPI commands? I can hardly believe that
>>> they are
>>> common on the block I/O...
>> When I checked (mounting and listing a CD), about 34% of
>> commands had slop 2.
> Hm, that probably involved the raw block reads. I don't remember the
> raw sector length off-hand but it may well be just even, not divisble by 4.
Oops, I read "listening" instead of "listing". :-/
But I thought that listing shouldn't involve anything other than block
reads. OTOH, I'm not familiar enough with ISO9660... What commands are you
seeing (if you have them dumped)?
>> But you're right, now I try copying
>> a large file, there's no slop involved in that at all.
>> Hugh
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists