linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 0/2] ia64: prevent irq migration race in __cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:13:38 -0700
From:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To:	tony.luck@...el.com
Cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, stable@...nel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ia64: prevent irq migration race in __cpu_disable
	path

This is v2 of my attempt to prevent an oops while offlining CPUs.

The change is that the patch becomes a full revert of Paul's
original patch, along with a long changelog that explains the
situation as best as I can determine. It's not 100% satisfactory
to me right now, but the testing we've done supports the patch.

The 2nd patch in the series is mostly cosmetic, and removes a
redundant call to cpu_clear() that we no longer need().

Tony, if you agree with the rationale in 1/2, then this series is
a candidate for .29.

stable team, if Tony pushes upstream for .29, then this series
should be applied to the .27 and .28 stable series.

Thanks.

/ac

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/