[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090209190142.GD19453@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:01:42 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Davide Rizzo <elpa.rizzo@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ben-linux@...ff.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] User access to internal clocks
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:54:57PM +0100, Davide Rizzo wrote:
> > What about adding a dedicated function to clk api that registers a struct clk
> > in a linked list and associates it with a name, with the only specific purpose
> > to enumerate and list (and possibly change rate and parents) all
> > clocks in sysfs ?
> > Obviously only specifically registered clocks will be visible in sysfs...
> >
>
> Or better, only proposed functions:
> int clk_for_each(int(*fn)(struct clk *, void *), void *data)
> and
> const char *clk_sysname(struct clk *)
> need to be added to clk api, the function to register the struct clk
> in the linked list could be implementation specific.
> Maybe a function like this:
> struct clk *clk_get_by_sysname(const char *sysname);
> could be useful to be added to api interface, too ?
I'm not going to reply unless you copy your replies to linux-arm-kernel.
By not copying that list, you're excluding maintainers for quite a number
of implementation maintainers from this discussion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists