[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262360902100431l4a5977e7p9c5152882f09dcf9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:31:04 +0900
From: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...ementarian.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vmscan: initialize sc->nr_reclaimed in do_try_to_free_pages()
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:06 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>> > {
>> > /* Minimum pages needed in order to stay on node */
>> > const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
>> > struct task_struct *p = current;
>> > struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
>> > int priority;
>> > struct scan_control sc = {
>> > .may_writepage = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
>> > .may_swap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_SWAP),
>> > .swap_cluster_max = max_t(unsigned long, nr_pages,
>> > SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
>> > .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
>> > .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
>> > .isolate_pages = isolate_pages_global,
>> > + .nr_reclaimed = 0;
>> > };
>>
>> Hmm.. I missed that. Thanks.
>> There is one in shrink_all_memory.
>
> No.
> __zone_reclaim isn't a part of shrink_all_memory().
> Currently, shrink_all_memory() don't use sc.nr_reclaimed member.
> (maybe, it's another wrong thing ;)
Hmm.. You're right.
As Johannes pointed out,
too many page shrinking can degrade resume performance.
We need to bale out in shrink_all_memory.
Other people, thought ?
--
Kinds regards,
MinChan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists