[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090210125424.GC12820@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:54:24 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/sysprof: add missing
tracing_{start,stop}_record_cmdline()
Em Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 04:43:30AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> Add the missing pair tracing_{start,stop}_record_cmdline() to record well
> the cmdline associated with pid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
This is another thing that I think begs for a TRACE_INIT_CMDLINE in
struct trace->flags so that just before calling ->init we call
tracing_start_cmdline_record? no?
Another thing I noticed is that even we having a ->stop most of the time
this semantic action is done thru ->reset :-\
- Arnaldo
> kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c
> index 84ca9d8..9902c15 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c
> @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ static int stack_trace_init(struct trace_array *tr)
> {
> sysprof_trace = tr;
>
> + tracing_start_cmdline_record();
> +
> mutex_lock(&sample_timer_lock);
> start_stack_timers();
> tracer_enabled = 1;
> @@ -247,6 +249,7 @@ static int stack_trace_init(struct trace_array *tr)
>
> static void stack_trace_reset(struct trace_array *tr)
> {
> + tracing_stop_cmdline_record();
> stop_stack_trace(tr);
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists