[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090210131428.GA11571@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:14:28 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: Make software counters work as per-cpu
counters
* Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> I tested it. The patch does fix the crash.
Great!
> > ok - i've applied your patch from email to allow Yanmin to test tip:master.
> Ingo,
>
> Here is the patch to add system-wide collection for perfstat.c.
>
> With the new parameter '-s', perfstat introduces very little overhead to benchmark
> testing. [...]
Very nice. I've applied your patch to perfstat.c and have uploaded the new version
to the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/perfcounters/perfstat.c
> [...] If tracking performance data without '-s', sometimes perfstat has too much
> impact on benchmark results, especially on netperf UDP-U-4k.
Yes - and we need to optimize that. It wont ever be zero-cost though, so -s makes
sense independently of any need for optimizations. -s can also be used to measure
the overhead of perfstat per task counters itself, via recursive inherited counters
like this:
perfstat -s perfstat ./workload
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists