[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4990DD97.5090705@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:51:19 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86: make lazy %gs optional on x86_32
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hmmm... I was (lazily) trying to add that %gs can only be cleared if
> it's being managed lazily because otherwise it might be being used by
> the kernel for other purposes. :-)
>
> Is my understanding correct?
Oh, hm, I see. We only want to zero it if we're using lazy gs,
otherwise it contains something useful... I need to run now, but I'll
look at it again in a few hours.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists