linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1234285547.30155.6.camel@nimitz>
Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:05:47 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart

On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:07 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote:
> Checkpoint-restart (c/r): a couple of fixes in preparation for 64bit
> architectures, and a couple of fixes for bugss (comments from Serge
> Hallyn, Sudakvev Bhattiprolu and Nathan Lynch). Updated and tested
> against v2.6.28.
> 
> Aiming for -mm.

Is there anything that we're waiting on before these can go into -mm?  I
think the discussion on the first few patches has died down to almost
nothing.  They're pretty reviewed-out.  Do they need a run in -mm?  I
don't think linux-next is quite appropriate since they're not _quite_
aimed at mainline yet.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/