linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] integrity: shmem zero fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4990C5F5.2050400@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:10:29 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
CC:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] integrity: shmem zero fix

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 18:02, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> Based on comments from Mike Frysinger and Randy Dunlap,
>> - moved ima.h include before CONFIG_SHMEM test
>> - added 'struct linux_binprm' in ima.h
> 
> please move the linux/fs.h include in linux/ima.h to match
> linux_binprm location while you're at it

Yes, that's the only difference with what I tested:

-#include <linux/fs.h>
-
 #ifndef _LINUX_IMA_H
 #define _LINUX_IMA_H
 
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+struct linux_binprm;
+




-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/