linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:25:55 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>
Cc:	tony.luck@...el.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next
 tree

On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:25:20 -0600
Dean Nelson <dcn@....com> wrote:

> Fix the ia64 build error that occurs in the linux-next tree by introducing
> an ia64 version of uv.h.  Additionally, clean up the usage of is_uv_system().

Would I be correct in believing that this repairs (and should be folded
into)

  commit 5b221278d61e3907a5e4104a844b63bc8bb3d43a
  Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
  Date:   Wed Jan 21 11:30:07 2009 +0100

      x86: uv cleanup, build fix #2

?

(it looks like 5b221278d61e3907a5e4104a844b63bc8bb3d43a should be
folded into something else, too.  What hath we wrought?)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/