[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090210214207.GB4879@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:42:08 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Hannes Eder <hannes@...neseder.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] trace: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 07:44:12PM +0100, Hannes Eder wrote:
> Impact: make global variables and a global function static
>
> The function '__trace_userstack' does not seem to have a caller, so it
> is commented out.
I guess it can even be dropped :-)
> Fix this sparse warnings:
> kernel/trace/trace.c:82:5: warning: symbol 'tracing_disabled' was not declared. Should it be static?
> kernel/trace/trace.c:600:10: warning: symbol 'trace_record_cmdline_disabled' was not declared. Should it be static?
> kernel/trace/trace.c:957:6: warning: symbol '__trace_userstack' was not declared. Should it be static?
> kernel/trace/trace.c:1694:5: warning: symbol 'tracing_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@...neseder.net>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index ef4dbac..0e7c84f 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int dummy_set_flag(u32 old_flags, u32 bit, int set)
> * of the tracer is successful. But that is the only place that sets
> * this back to zero.
> */
> -int tracing_disabled = 1;
> +static int tracing_disabled = 1;
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, ftrace_cpu_disabled);
>
> @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static int cmdline_idx;
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(trace_cmdline_lock);
>
> /* temporary disable recording */
> -atomic_t trace_record_cmdline_disabled __read_mostly;
> +static atomic_t trace_record_cmdline_disabled __read_mostly;
>
> static void trace_init_cmdlines(void)
> {
> @@ -954,10 +954,12 @@ static void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct trace_array *tr,
> #endif
> }
>
> -void __trace_userstack(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long flags)
> +#ifdef UNUSED
> +static void __trace_userstack(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long flags)
> {
> ftrace_trace_userstack(tr, flags, preempt_count());
> }
> +#endif /* UNUSED */
>
> static void
> ftrace_trace_special(void *__tr,
> @@ -1691,7 +1693,7 @@ int tracing_open_generic(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int tracing_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +static int tracing_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> struct seq_file *m = (struct seq_file *)file->private_data;
> struct trace_iterator *iter = m->private;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists