[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FF038EB85946AA46B18DFEE6E6F8A289950C30@xmb-rtp-218.amer.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:28:15 -0500
From: "David VomLehn (dvomlehn)" <dvomlehn@...co.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Propagate CRAMFS uncompression errors
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Propagate CRAMFS uncompression errors
>
> "David VomLehn (dvomlehn)" <dvomlehn@...co.com> wrote:
>
> > If cramfs_uncompress_block detects an error uncompressing it will
> > return a zero value. This patch checks the return value and
> propagates
> > the error back up to the block layer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com>
> > ---
> > fs/cramfs/inode.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/cramfs/inode.c b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> > index a07338d..6ff8a5e 100644
> > --- a/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> > @@ -493,7 +493,15 @@ static int cramfs_readpage(struct file *file,
> > struct page * page)
>
> Your email client is wordwrapping the patches.
Sorry. I sent it to myself first, and didn't have a problem. I hate
email programs.
> > memset(pgdata + bytes_filled, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE -
> > bytes_filled);
> > kunmap(page);
> > flush_dcache_page(page);
> > - SetPageUptodate(page);
> > +
> > + if (bytes_filled == 0) {
> > + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > + SetPageError(page);
> > + }
> > +
> > + else
> > + SetPageUptodate(page);
> > +
> > unlock_page(page);
> > return 0;
>
> A more typical code layout would be
>
> if (bytes_filled == 0) {
> ClearPageUptodate(page);
> SetPageError(page);
> } else
> SetPageUptodate(page);
>
> or (better, IMO):
>
> if (bytes_filled == 0) {
> ClearPageUptodate(page);
> SetPageError(page);
> } else {
> SetPageUptodate(page);
> }
>
>
> This patch will incorrectly cause the driver to report an IO error if
> the (page->index < maxblock) test returns false. For example, a
> pread() which is wholly outside the end-of-file should return
> zero, not
> -EIO.
>
> cramfs_readpage() handles this case very strangely, although not
> obviously buggily. Probably this function never even gets
> called for a
> read wholly outside i_size.
>
> How does this version look to you?
>
> --- a/fs/cramfs/inode.c~propagate-cramfs-uncompression-errors
> +++ a/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> @@ -488,12 +488,19 @@ static int cramfs_readpage(struct file *
> compr_len);
> mutex_unlock(&read_mutex);
> }
> - } else
> - pgdata = kmap(page);
> - memset(pgdata + bytes_filled, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE -
> bytes_filled);
> - kunmap(page);
> - flush_dcache_page(page);
> - SetPageUptodate(page);
> +
> + if (bytes_filled == 0) {
> + /* Decompression error */
> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> + SetPageError(page);
> + } else {
> + memset(pgdata + bytes_filled, 0,
> + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - bytes_filled);
> + flush_dcache_page(page);
> + SetPageUptodate(page);
> + }
> + kunmap(page);
> + }
> unlock_page(page);
> return 0;
> }
Better, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists