[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902092120450.3048@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:23:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, thomas.pi@...or.dea,
Yuriy Lalym <ylalym@...il.com>, ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm fix page writeback accounting to fix oom condition
under heavy I/O
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> So this patch fixes this behavior by only decrementing the page accounting
> _after_ the block I/O writepage has been done.
This makes no sense, really.
Or rather, I don't mind the notion of updating the counters only after IO
per se, and _that_ part of it probably makes sense. But why is it that you
only then fix up two of the call-sites. There's a lot more call-sites than
that for this function.
So if this really makes a big difference, that's an interesting starting
point for discussion, but I don't see how this particular patch could
possibly be the right thing to do.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists