linux-kernel - GFS2 file locking issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2d42915c0902110255k3c0741a9s6830765bce6be052@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:55:08 +0300
From:	Kirill Kuvaldin <kirill.kuvaldin@...il.com>
To:	linux-cluster@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: GFS2 file locking issues

Hi,

I'm trying to understand how the FS locking mechanism should work.

I'm running a clustered GFS2 across two nodes, each node is a Xen domU.
To check if locking works correctly I wrote the simple perl script below.
Basically the script opens a file, locks it to prevent others from
writing into it, writes 20 lines into it, then unlocks and closes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#!/usr/bin/perl

# usage:
#  lock.pl filename uniq
#           filename - file name being written to
#           uniq     - an unique label to distinguish output of
different processes

use strict;
use Time::HiRes qw(sleep);
use FileHandle;
use Fcntl ':flock';

my $filename = $ARGV[0];
my $uniq = $ARGV[1];

open FH, '>>', $filename or die $!;
flock(FH,LOCK_EX) or die $!;
FH->autoflush(1);

for (1..20) {
        print FH "$uniq\n";
        sleep (0.1);
}

flock(FH,LOCK_UN);
close FH;
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I ran that script on both nodes simultaneously with commands:

vm01# perl lock.pl /gfs2/testfile a
vm02# perl lock.pl /gfs2/testfile b

Then to my surprise "a"s and "b"s are randomly shuffled in the testfile like

...
a
a
b
a
b
b
...

whereas I supposed it should have been like

...
a
a
a
b
b
b
...

It looks like either locking is broken in my GFS2 (I use kernel
2.6.18-92.el5xen for CentOS 5.2) or my understanding of locking isn't
correct.
I also tested the script on GFS1 and OCFS2 and it worked well, i.e.
the output was correct.

Thanks,
Kirill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/