[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1234353613.23438.131.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:00:13 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Rolando Martins <rolando.martins@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: cgroup, RT reservation per core(s)?
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:23 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2009-02-11 12:42:14]:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 11:33 +0000, Rolando Martins wrote:
> >
> > > Hi again,
> > >
> > > is there any way to have multiple "distinct" sched domains, i.e.:
> > > mount -t cgroup -o cpu none /dev/sched_domain_0
> > > .... setup sched_domain_0 (ex: 90% RT, 10% Others)
> > > mount -t cgroup -o cpu none /dev/sched_domain_1
> > > .... setup sched_domain_1 (ex: 20% RT, 80% Others)
> > > Then give sched_domain_0 to cpuset A and sched_domain_1 to B?
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > We currently only support a single instance of a cgroup controller.
> >
> > I see the use for what you propose, however implementing that will be
> > 'interesting'.
>
> I am confused, if you cpusets, you get your own sched_domain. If you
> mount cpusets and cpu controller together, you'll get what you want.
> Is this a figment of my imagination. You might need to use exclusive
> CPUsets though.
afaiui he wants a cgroup hierarchy per exclusive sched domain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists