[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090211123526.GF16535@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:35:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>,
fweisbec@...il.com, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] trace: splice support for tracing_pipe
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> > +
> > +static ssize_t tracing_splice_read_pipe(struct file *filp,
> > + loff_t *ppos,
> > + struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > + size_t len,
> > + unsigned int flags)
> > +{
> > + struct page *pages[PIPE_BUFFERS];
> > + struct partial_page partial[PIPE_BUFFERS];
> > + struct trace_iterator *iter = filp->private_data;
> > + struct splice_pipe_desc spd = {
> > + .pages = pages,
> > + .partial = partial,
> > + .nr_pages = 0, /* This gets updated below. */
> > + .flags = flags,
> > + .ops = &tracing_pipe_buf_ops,
> > + .spd_release = tracing_spd_release_pipe,
> > + };
>
> Note, this is getting a little stack heavy. It is still in bounds,
> but I get very nervous when I see structure arrays on the stack.
> If either the structure or the array grows large, we can be in trouble.
Good point - but note that this is how splice support is implemented in
a number of other files - so if PIPE_BUFFERS or partial_page grows in
size, those places will fail too.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists