lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090211124802.GI16535@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:48:02 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Rohit Jain <rjain@...are.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PARAVIRT/x86] BUGFIX: Put a missing paravirt_release_pmd in
	pgd_dtor


* Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 04:10 -0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Applied to tip:x86/urgent, thanks guys!
> 
> Thanks Ingo, 
> 
> I gave the tip tree a spin today and hit this bug.
> 
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
> IP: [<(null)>] (null)
> *pdpt = 0000000000839001 *pde = 0000000000c97067 *pte = 0000000000000163
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> last sysfs file:
> Modules linked in:
> 
> Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.29-rc4-tip #18) VMware Virtual
> Platform
> EIP: 0062:[<00000000>] EFLAGS: 00010293 CPU: 0
> EIP is at 0x0
> EAX: 00000001 EBX: 00006000 ECX: c077ed00 EDX: 00006000
> ESI: 00000001 EDI: 00000001 EBP: ef04cf40 ESP: ef04cf1c
>  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 006a
> Process swapper (pid: 1, ti=ef04c000 task=ef050000 task.ti=ef04c000)
> Stack:
>  c0644e52 00000000 ef04cf24 ef04cf24 c064468d c0886dc0 00000000 c0702aea
>  ef055480 00000001 00000101 dead4ead ffffffff ffffffff c08af530 00000000
>  c0709715 ef04cf60 ef04cf60 00000001 00000000 00000000 dead4ead ffffffff
> Call Trace:
>  [<c0644e52>] ? native_cpu_up+0x2de/0x45b
>  [<c064468d>] ? do_fork_idle+0x0/0x19
>  [<c0645c5e>] ? _cpu_up+0x88/0xe8
>  [<c0645d20>] ? cpu_up+0x42/0x4e
>  [<c07e7462>] ? kernel_init+0x99/0x14b
>  [<c07e73c9>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x14b
>  [<c040375f>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> Code:  Bad EIP value.
> EIP: [<00000000>] 0x0 SS:ESP 006a:ef04cf1c

This is the crash fixed by your later genapic patch, right?

> This happens with out the fix too. So was wondering if there is any
> other known bug in the tip tree. 
> Also note that i synced to the mainline tree (29-rc4) and that works
> fine. So this only exists in tip.
> I will debug this later today, but if anyone has any ideas about this
> bug do let me know. 
> 
> And ya i also had to apply this patch to get tip to compile. 

yes, that should be fixed too - it appeared briefly.

Let me know if you can see any problems with the latest -tip tree.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ