[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4423d670902110452s5fb6d041l2363c8ad9b9618fb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:52:05 +0300
From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: next-20090211: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
2009/2/11 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 13:24 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 13:23 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:14 +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > Full dmesg is attached.
>> > >
>> > > Lock dependency validator: Copyright (c) 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar
>> > > .... MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES: 8
>> > > .... MAX_LOCK_DEPTH: 48
>> > > .... MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS: 8191
>> > > .... CLASSHASH_SIZE: 4096
>> > > .... MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES: 8192
>> > > .... MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS: 16384
>> > > .... CHAINHASH_SIZE: 8192
>> > > memory used by lock dependency info: 4351 kB
>> > > per task-struct memory footprint: 2688 bytes
>> > > <..>
>> > > BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
>> > > turning off the locking correctness validator.
>> >
>> > Is this an allyesconfig or something other massive bloated?
>>
>> Sorry, not playing attention, its SUB classes.. let me look at that,
>> that smells like a rotten annotation.
>
> Could you run with the below patch, so that we can see where this
> happens?
BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
turning off the locking correctness validator.
Pid: 2105, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Not tainted 2.6.29-rc4-next-20090211-dirty #2
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8026cbf9>] __lock_acquire+0x6b9/0x12c0
[<ffffffff8026d891>] lock_acquire+0x91/0xc0
[<ffffffff80447324>] ? btrfs_tree_lock+0xc4/0x160
[<ffffffff8062eb36>] _spin_lock_nested+0x46/0x80
[<ffffffff80447324>] ? btrfs_tree_lock+0xc4/0x160
[<ffffffff80447324>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xc4/0x160
[<ffffffff804471a0>] ? btrfs_wake_function+0x0/0x10
[<ffffffff8040bce6>] btrfs_init_new_buffer+0xa6/0x150
[<ffffffff80412fa1>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x81/0x90
[<ffffffff80402a16>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x7a6/0xb70
[<ffffffff804034e2>] btrfs_cow_block+0x112/0x2d0
[<ffffffff804072f3>] btrfs_search_slot+0x223/0xb00
[<ffffffff80235a99>] ? sub_preempt_count+0xa9/0xf0
[<ffffffff804178d1>] btrfs_lookup_csum+0x61/0x150
[<ffffffff8026c2ed>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff80418356>] btrfs_csum_file_blocks+0xc6/0x7d0
[<ffffffff802c2315>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb5/0x110
[<ffffffff802c2315>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb5/0x110
[<ffffffff8026c2ed>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff80437c76>] ? free_extent_state+0x46/0x70
[<ffffffff80439462>] ? clear_extent_bit+0xe2/0x2e0
[<ffffffff8042166a>] add_pending_csums+0x4a/0x70
[<ffffffff80422ac5>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x115/0x1e0
[<ffffffff80422ba0>] btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook+0x10/0x20
[<ffffffff8043abf4>] end_bio_extent_writepage+0x104/0x1e0
[<ffffffff8026c282>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x182/0x1e0
[<ffffffff802ef0cc>] bio_endio+0x1c/0x40
[<ffffffff8041b02b>] end_workqueue_fn+0xeb/0x120
[<ffffffff804446ea>] worker_loop+0x7a/0x1b0
[<ffffffff80444670>] ? worker_loop+0x0/0x1b0
[<ffffffff80259126>] kthread+0x56/0x90
[<ffffffff8020cc5a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff80235969>] ? finish_task_switch+0x89/0x110
[<ffffffff8062f546>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x36/0x60
[<ffffffff8020c640>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff802590d0>] ? kthread+0x0/0x90
[<ffffffff8020cc50>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists