lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090211150103.GA15814@sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:01:03 -0600
From:	Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:25:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:25:20 -0600
> Dean Nelson <dcn@....com> wrote:
> 
> > Fix the ia64 build error that occurs in the linux-next tree by introducing
> > an ia64 version of uv.h.  Additionally, clean up the usage of is_uv_system().
> 
> Would I be correct in believing that this repairs (and should be folded
> into)
> 
>   commit 5b221278d61e3907a5e4104a844b63bc8bb3d43a
>   Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>   Date:   Wed Jan 21 11:30:07 2009 +0100
> 
>       x86: uv cleanup, build fix #2
> 
> ?
>
> (it looks like 5b221278d61e3907a5e4104a844b63bc8bb3d43a should be
> folded into something else, too.  What hath we wrought?)

Yes, it does fix an issue introduced by:

   commit: bdbcdd48883940bbd8d17eb01172d58a261a413a
   author: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
   date:   Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:26:06 +0000

	x86: uv cleanup

which the commit you mention above attempted to fix.

I'll leave it to you and Ingo to determine whether my patch should be
folded into Ingo's or Tejun's patch.

Ingo, I see that you've applied my patch to your tip tree. What are
your thoughts on Andrew's question?

Thanks,
Dean

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ