[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902111147450.15438@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:49:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] git pull request for tip/tracing/core
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > Steven Rostedt (7):
> > > ring-buffer: add NMI protection for spinlocks
> > > nmi: add generic nmi tracking state
>
> hm, this commit breaks a number of non-x86 architectures the following way:
>
> In file included from /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/interrupt.h:12,
> from /home/mingo/tip/arch/ia64/include/asm/mca.h:16,
> from /home/mingo/tip/arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17:
> /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/hardirq.h:67:2: #error PREEMPT_ACTIVE too high!
> make[2]: *** [arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>
> Alpha and ARM are broken too. (and possibly others)
Looking at this, it doesn't seem like it should be a problem. Perhaps the
CPP is treating the number as signed. Does this patch fix the compile?
-- Steve
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
diff --git a/include/linux/hardirq.h b/include/linux/hardirq.h
index f3cf86e..9bd4302 100644
--- a/include/linux/hardirq.h
+++ b/include/linux/hardirq.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
#define NMI_OFFSET (PREEMPT_ACTIVE << 1)
-#if NMI_OFFSET >= 0x80000000
+#if NMI_OFFSET >= 0x80000000UL
#error PREEMPT_ACTIVE too high!
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists