[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49931F04.80605@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:55:00 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86: more header untangling
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> constants can be considered data types too.
Huh, that's a pretty broad definition of "type", to the degree that's
its fairly counter-intuitive and misleading. But I don't care that much.
> Small inlines are borderlines,
> they should generally not be in _types.h headers. Really, _types.h headers
> are only there to instantiate a type, to enable dependent inline methods
> to use them.
>
In this case the inlines are the accessor functions to do the pte_t <->
pteval_t (un)wrapping. They're trivial and have no dependencies apart
from the types they're right next to.
Anyway, check out
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
x86/untangle now. I had to merge in tip/x86/paravirt to get the
pte_flags changes I made there, and unfortunately it didn't merge
completely cleanly, so there's probably some spurious changes in there.
I guess I can respin it into a clean branch.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists