linux-kernel - [PATCH NET-NEXT 0/10] hardware time stamping with new fields in shinfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1234450670.5914.9.camel@ecld0pohly>
Date:	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:57:50 +0100
From:	Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH NET-NEXT 0/10] hardware time stamping with new fields in
	shinfo

Hello!

This revision of the patch series transports hardware time stamps from
the hardware into user space via additional fields in struct
skb_shared_info. It's based on net-next-2.6 as of this morning.

This is the solution that emerged from the discussion of the other
approaches suggested before (reuse tstamp, extend skbuff, optional
structs): it has the advantage of not touching skbuff and also has the
simplest implementation.

The clocksource and timecompare patches have been reviewed by John
Stultz. He doesn't mind merging them via the net subtree.

John Ronciak reviewed the igb driver patches. He suggested to merge the
patches as they; after all, PTPd already works fine. I just tested again
on 32 and 64 bit x86, both with the timestamping example programs as
well as with PTPd. Latest patched PTPd is here:
        http://github.com/pohly/ptpd/tree/master

The open TODOs in the igb driver will be fixed. We think that this will
be easier with the infrastructure and the driver in a regular kernel
tree.

David, I hope you consider the patches acceptable now. If not, then as
before: please let me know what I can do to make them acceptable.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/