linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7][RFC] function graph tracer port to PowerPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902121157120.15469@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:58:14 -0500 (EST)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][RFC] function graph tracer port to PowerPC


On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> 
> Yes of course, I knew most of it was architecture independant but I delayed
> this TODO for future ports, and you've done it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Just a micro detail: the ftrace_push/pop_return_trace are parts of
> the core of the entry/return probe, something that could be used
> by other users than the function graph tracer itself.
> 
> Perhaps it would be better to put them in kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> What do you think?

I'll go with your above method. We'll move it when it comes to that ;-)

> 
> Anyway, Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>

Thanks!

I'll update my repo.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/