[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49945C90.3010104@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:29:52 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
CC: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, fernando@....ac.jp,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: vfs: Add MS_FLUSHONFSYNC mount flag
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
>> This mount flag will be used to determine whether the block device's write
>> cache should be flush or not on fsync()/fdatasync().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
>> ---
>
> Again, apologies for chiming in late.
>
> But wouldn't it be better to make this a block device property rather
> than a new filesystem mount option?
>
> That way the filesystem can always do "the right thing" and call the
> blkdev flush on fsync.
>
> The block device *could* choose to ignore this in hardware if it knows
> it's built with a nonvolatile write cache or if it has no write cache.
That would certainly be my preference -- turn this ON by default, and
them if a layer NEEDS to ignore it, it can.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists