[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46e1c7760902121312o1476e734xc1fc1d6e11ce4d2e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:12:26 +0200
From: Risto Suominen <risto.suominen@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: geert@...ux-m68k.org, adaplas@....net,
linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm>
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] fb: hide cursor in graphics mode
2009/2/12 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>:
>> ---
>> The testing is done on kernel version 2.6.18.
>
> That's a truly ancient kernel. Is the patch needed on current kernels?
> Does it work correctly in current kernels?
>
It does not on 2.6.24. The patch works.
> How does the cursor get re-enabled?
>
I have not thought of that.
> Should we be calling ops->cursor() if fbcon_is_inactive() is true?
>
Maybe we shouldn't, but we must. The situation is that we are ordered
to enter graphics mode and the variable saying 'graphics' is already
set in vt_ioctl.c. fbcon_is_inactive() tests it and returns true.
The question is, whether this function is called later during normal
operation, and how often?
Risto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists