[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49939B08.1050801@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:44:08 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, cpw@....com
Subject: Re: #tj-percpu has been rebased
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:16:59 Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> Anyways, please pull from
>>>>
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu
>>> Thanks. cpualloc patches rebased on top of it (I had to include the module
>>> patch I've got queued for 2.6.29, otherwise gratuitous conflicts):
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/tj-percpu-cpualloc master
>>>
>>> Boot tested here, but that's no guarantee that something didn't break.
>>>
>>> I'm going to be occupied with finishing off cpumask_t this cycle, so I'd be
>>> happy for you to take ownership of any and all of these that you want to keep.
>>> I'll try to keep up with other patches as you post them.
>> Will merge it in this week.
>
> Okay, just went through the patchset. It generally looks nice and
> clean but I'm still a bit hung up on the idea of making percpu area
> resizable. I'll look into Christoph Lameter's cpu_alloc patchset too
> and think about it more.
Oops, those are the same ones. I'll give a shot at cooking up
something which can be dynamically sized before going forward with
this one.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists