linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix the itimer regression (BZ 12618)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090213100606.GC1300@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:06:06 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com" <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix the itimer regression (BZ 12618)


* Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> wrote:

> 
> > FYI, in Linus's latest tree (v2.6.29-rc4-175-gb578f3f or later), all
> > the scheduler related performance regressions should be addressed.
> > 
> > Could you please double-check that there's no performance regression
> > remaining?
> 
> I have tested the latest git tree(071a0bc2).
> hackbench, volanoMark, oltp, specjbb2005 regressions are all fixed.

Great - thanks for testing it!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/