[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090213105442.GA24328@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:54:42 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm 2/2] ptrace_untrace: fix the SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED check
This bug is ancient too. ptrace_untrace() must not resume the task
if the group stop in progress, we should set TASK_STOPPED instead.
Unfortunately, we still have problems here:
- if the process/thread was traced, SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED
does not necessary means this thread group is stopped.
- ptrace breaks the bookkeeping of ->group_stop_count.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
--- 6.29-rc3/kernel/ptrace.c~2_FIX_STOPPED 2009-02-13 11:06:56.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/kernel/ptrace.c 2009-02-13 11:38:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -60,11 +60,15 @@ static void ptrace_untrace(struct task_s
{
spin_lock(&child->sighand->siglock);
if (task_is_traced(child)) {
- if (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED) {
+ /*
+ * If the group stop is completed or in progress,
+ * this thread was already counted as stopped.
+ */
+ if (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED ||
+ child->signal->group_stop_count)
__set_task_state(child, TASK_STOPPED);
- } else {
+ else
signal_wake_up(child, 1);
- }
}
spin_unlock(&child->sighand->siglock);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists