[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49959EFA.8040507@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:25:30 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 headers: include linux/types.h
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Regarding the fixlet below - wouldnt PTE_FLAGS_MASK be better placed in
> pgtable_types.h ? It's specifically related to the pte format. OTOH we
> have a lot of PTE details in the page_*types.h files already.
>
No, you're right.
> The boundary between page_types.h and pgtable_types.h does not seem to
> be clear to me - what is the principle you followed?
>
Well, basically anything to do with the internals of a pte*_t go in
pgtable.h. PTE_*_MASK should go there too, and is an oversight (though
its on the margin because of its dependency on the page size/mask
definitions in page*.h).
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists