[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090213185916.GA22651@localhost>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:59:16 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junio@...ox.com>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
L-K <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: git-send-email
[H. Peter Anvin - Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:13:16AM -0800]
| Junio C Hamano wrote:
| >
| > I personally prefer the former, but as you hopefully all found out by now,
| > the choice between these two is just the matter of personal taste, and
| > there is no clear majority.
| >
|
| Quite on the contrary. I think there is a clear majority in favor of
| --no-chain-reply-to. Let me add my voice to that chorus, too.
|
| -hpa
|
| --
| H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
| I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
|
If that somehow matter -- I'm _for_ --no-chain-reply-to
by default too. It happens several times with me that
I missed this option even having in mind --no-chain-reply-to
behaviour expected.
On the other hand I think --no-chain-reply-to has much
sense if pathes being sent are not numbered in title.
But on LKML I can't remember even one mail-thread which was
not numbered :)
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists