linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v2 01/12] PCI: don't scan existing devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090213201858.19262.67639.stgit@bob.kio>
Date:	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:18:58 -0700
From:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To:	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>,
	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 01/12] PCI: don't scan existing devices

From: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>

pci_scan_single_device is supposed to add newly discovered
devices to pci_bus->devices, but doesn't check to see if the
device has already been added. This can cause problems if we ever
want to use this interface to rescan the PCI bus.

If the device is already added, just return it.

Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
---

 drivers/pci/probe.c |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 55ec44a..66b5d1c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1006,6 +1006,12 @@ struct pci_dev *__ref pci_scan_single_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
 
+	dev = pci_get_slot(bus, devfn);
+	if (dev) {
+		pci_dev_put(dev);
+		return dev;
+	}
+
 	dev = pci_scan_device(bus, devfn);
 	if (!dev)
 		return NULL;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/