[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090213054751.GI28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:47:51 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: containers@...ts.osdl.org, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [cgroup or VFS ?] WARNING: at fs/namespace.c:636
mntput_no_expire+0xac/0xf2()
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:09:17PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> I ran following testcase, and triggered the warning in 1 hour:
>
> thread 1:
> for ((; ;))
> {
> mount --bind /cgroup /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> }
>
> tread 2:
> for ((; ;))
> {
> mount -t cgroup -o cpu xxx /cgroup > /dev/null 2>&1
> mkdir /cgroup/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
> rmdir /cgroup/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
> umount -l /cgroup > /dev/null 2>&1
> }
Wow. You know, at that point these redirects could probably be removed.
If anything in there ends up producing an output, we very much want to
see that. Actually, I'd even make that
mount --bind /cgroup/mnt || (echo mount1: ; date)
etc., so we'd see when do they fail and which one fails (if any)...
Which umount has failed in the above, BTW?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists