[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902141410220.14911@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:12:10 -0800 (PST)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
cc: Michael Riepe <michael.riepe@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: install firmware in a kernel-dependent directory
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Michael Riepe
> <michael.riepe@...glemail.com> wrote:
>> Currently, make firmware_install puts all firmware blobs in
>> /lib/firmware. If you have several kernel versions installed, they will
>> overwrite each other's files, which may lead to problems if the blobs
>> eventually change. I think it would be better to use a separate
>> directory for every kernel version, like /lib/firmware/$(uname -r) or
>> /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/firmware (the latter is my favorite).
>>
>> In either case, only a minimal modification in /lib/udev/firmware.sh is
>> required to make it look in the new directory first.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> firmware version depends on hardware version not by kernel (software) version.
are you sure? different firmware could have different interfaces for the
kernel to use.
I don't know if this is a problem in practice (I think I've heard of
this), but there is no reason it couldn't be.
David Lang
> So /lib/firmware is absolutely OK.
>
> --
> JSR
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists