[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090214214111.24377.87888.stgit@vmbox.hanneseder.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:42:03 +0100
From: Hannes Eder <hannes@...neseder.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 27/43] drivers/net/sfc: fix sparse warnings: Should it be
static?
Impact: Include header file and include the function under the same
condition as in the header file. If CONFIG_SFS_MTD is not defined
than the functions 'efx_mtd_remove' and 'efx_mtd_rename' are defined
'static inline' with an empty function body in the header file.
Fix this sparse warnings:
drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:204:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:221:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_rename' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:230:5: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@...neseder.net>
---
drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
index 665cafb..94c9ed8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#define EFX_DRIVER_NAME "sfc_mtd"
#include "net_driver.h"
#include "spi.h"
+#include "efx.h"
#define EFX_SPI_VERIFY_BUF_LEN 16
@@ -201,6 +202,7 @@ static void efx_mtd_sync(struct mtd_info *mtd)
return;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_MTD
void efx_mtd_remove(struct efx_nic *efx)
{
if (efx->spi_flash && efx->spi_flash->mtd) {
@@ -266,3 +268,4 @@ int efx_mtd_probe(struct efx_nic *efx)
return 0;
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SFC_MTD */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists