linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] olpc: fix model detection without OFW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:53:11 -0500
From:	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] olpc: fix model detection without OFW

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:43:12 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
[...]
> 
> Applied to tip:x86/urgent [for v2.6.29], thanks guys!
> 
> Did i get the impact-line below right?
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

More like -

Impact: garbled display, laptop is unusable

;)

The DCON detection code determines whether there's a DCON attached
based upon the model (any XO model >= B2 is assumed to have a DCON).
The LXFB driver determines which mode to use based upon whether or not
it thinks there's a DCON attached, and the DCON/LXFB can't deal w/
standard modes.

So, the result is that LXFB attempts to use some random standard mode
rather than the DCON-required 1200x900, and the display is unusable.



> ---------------->
> From 307250cda516547c0b0fe70dc3a3626bd82820cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:56:18 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, olpc: fix model detection without OFW
> 
> Impact: make certain OLPC-board revision based quirks [mouse, sound]
> work properly
> 
> Harvey's endianness patch (e51a1ac2dfca9ad869471e88f828281db7e810c0)
> breaks model comparison on OLPC; the value 0xc2 needs to be scaled
> up by olpc_board().  The pre-patch version was wrong, but accidentally
> worked anyway (big-endian 0xc2 is big enough to satisfy all other
> board revisions, but little endian 0xc2 is not).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Acked-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
> Cc: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/olpc.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/olpc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/olpc.c
> index 7a13fac..4006c52 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/olpc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/olpc.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void __init platform_detect(void)
>  static void __init platform_detect(void)
>  {
>  	/* stopgap until OFW support is added to the kernel */
> -	olpc_platform_info.boardrev = 0xc2;
> +	olpc_platform_info.boardrev = olpc_board(0xc2);
>  }
>  #endif
>  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/