linux-kernel - Re: git-send-email

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1234722605.4713.192.camel@laptop>
Date:	Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:30:05 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Junio C Hamano <junio@...ox.com>,
	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
	L-K <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: git-send-email

On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 18:20 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Just like the kernel folks take regressions seriously to the point to say
> > breaking one person's working setup is worse than fixing a known bug that
> > affects many more people,
> 
> BTW, from the manual:
> 
>        --chain-reply-to, --no-chain-reply-to
>            [...] Default is the value of the sendemail.chainreplyto
>            configuration value; if that is unspecified, default to
>            --chain-reply-to.
> 
> Everybody who isn't afraid of configuration files can implement his
> preferred default easily.

Yep, trouble is with all those folks who

 1) don't know about the option
 2) aren't educated to know its a good idea to use it

So by changing the default we're better off all around.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/