| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090215102708.GA4154@in.ibm.com> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:57:08 +0530 From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...izon.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, richardj_moore@...ibm.com, jason.wessel@...driver.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Patch 10/10] Sample HW breakpoint over kernel data address On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:43:41PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * K.Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:38:41AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Friday 13 February 2009, K.Prasad wrote: > > > > > > A whole patch series sent as private email, but which should have been > > > submitted to lkml? Please configure your email agent correctly. > > > > I realised that a little late and hence bounced the mails to LKML. It > > was an oversight on my part, will be more careful henceforth. > > Hm, bouncing is not necessarily a good idea, as followups will not have > lkml Cc:-ed. I'd suggest a repost, with lkml added. > > Ingo Sure. I'm re-posting the patches with LKML included in the recipient. Thanks, K.Prasad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists