[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ljs6pmao.fsf@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:02:23 +0100
From: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12650] Strange load average and ksoftirqd behavior with 2.6.29-rc2-git1
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> [090216 13:26]:
> We do get 0x100 which is 1 << RCU_SOFTIRQ, i.e. the RCU softirq. Paul,
> this indeed seems to be a CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y bug.
> What is weird is that RCU_SOFTIRQ gets set again and again - but there's
> no raise_softirq() calls. Could you please do a two-CPU trace too via:
> echo 3 > /debug/tracing/tracing_cpumask
> So that we can see what's happening on the other CPU?
> Also, could you please apply the debug patch below (or update to the
> very latest -tip tree), so that we get trace entries of softirq triggers
> too?
Ok, the new trace with these additional modifications is here:
http://damien.wyart.free.fr/ksoftirqd_pb/trace_tip_2009.02.16_1300_ksoftirqd_pb_abstime_proc_mask3.txt.gz
--
Damien
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists