[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090216132118.GD23665@hack.private>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:21:18 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Luca Bigliardi <shammash@...ha.org>, trivial@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdike@...toit.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix vde network backend in user mode linux
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 01:51:35PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Américo Wang wrote:
>
>> >[ doesn't seem to be picked up by anyone into current -next nor -mmotm,
>> > but isn't appropriate for trivial; adding akpm to cc ]
>> >> * Replace kmalloc() with uml_kmalloc()
>> >> (fix build failure)
>> Weird... I sent a patch for this several months ago! I thought Jeff had
>> already taken it... No?
>
>I am not sure whether this has been fixed in another way, but current
>linux-next still has
>
> void vde_init_libstuff(struct vde_data *vpri, struct vde_init *init)
> {
> struct vde_open_args *args;
>
> vpri->args = kmalloc(sizeof(struct vde_open_args), UM_GFP_KERNEL);
>
>so the patch hasn't been at least applied in the form it has been
>submitted.
Hmmm, no, I just checked, but more than half a year ago, we already
did this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/23/142
It looks like Jeff is too busy to maintain UML patches recently...
Andrew, could you please take UML patches for us? Recently I also
saw some uml patches but no one took them (at least I don't know).
If Andrew can't do this, I would like to take those patches to send
to Linus, if others don't have objections. Andrew?
--
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists