[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4999717F.7090205@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:00:31 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove errors caught by checkpatch.pl in kernel/kallsyms.c
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Furthermore, the changelog is bad (non-exiting in fact).
>>
>> The fact that the issues where discovered using checkpatch is absolutely
>> uninteresting. The changelog should describe /what/ is fixed, [...]
>
> The commit log definitely needs enhancements but it's not uninteresting
> at all what tools were used to arrive to a change. [...] if a
> good and acceptable commit results out of a tool's usage then that tool
> needs to be advertised some more.)
Fine, then the author could mention it below the --- delimitor in the
patch posting. The changelog however, as annotation of the source
history, is not a billboard. We also don't describe for example that a
nice cup of hot Earl Grey or whatever was vital to the creation of a patch.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= --=- =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists