[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090216135339.53b4a911@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:53:39 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:48:32 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > Userland should never ever control the state of a device like this
> > directly. It should do so by a) closing the device and b) setting
> > latency / functional requirements.
>
> The user, however, may want to forcibly put a device into a low power
> state without stopping all of the applications that depend on it (eg.
> have it open). Do you think that we shouldn't allow users to do such
> things?
I would think that that is a bad mistake to do. It basically breaks the
contract that the kernel has with userspace....
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists