[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090216012110.GA13575@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:21:10 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export symbol ksize()
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:00:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> But kmem_cache_size() would tell you how much extra secret memory there
> is available after the object?
>
> How that gets along with redzoning is a bit of a mystery though.
>
> The whole concept is quite hacky and nasty, isn't it?. Does
> networking/crypto actually show any gain from pulling this stunt?
I see no point in calling ksize on memory that's not kmalloced.
So no there is nothing to be gained from having kmem_cache_ksize.
However, for kmalloced memory we're wasting hundreds of bytes
for the standard 1500 byte allocation without ksize which means
that we're doing reallocations (and sometimes copying) when it
isn't necessary.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists