linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] module, kbuild: Faster boot with custom kernel.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:21:56 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Andreas Robinson <andr345@...il.com>
Cc:	sam@...nborg.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] module, kbuild: Faster boot with custom kernel.

On Monday 16 February 2009 04:50:22 Andreas Robinson wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> as you know, systems with custom kernels boot faster, since they don't
> need an initramfs or have to install modules. But, building a custom
> kernel it is not really practical if you are releasing a distro, for
> example.

Hi Andreas,

  This isn't crazy.  But you'd need to benchmark against the minimal
userspace solution: a binary with all the modules built into
it which calls sys_init_module on each one, then does the root swizzle
or whatever.

I think you'd find the difference to be in the noise.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/